BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//David Asper Centre for Constitutional Rights - ECPv6.15.18//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://aspercentre.ca
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for David Asper Centre for Constitutional Rights
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Toronto
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20240310T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20241103T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20250309T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20251102T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20260308T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20261101T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20270314T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20271107T060000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Toronto:20250630T170000
DTEND;TZID=America/Toronto:20250630T170000
DTSTAMP:20260405T163400
CREATED:20250423T145445Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250423T151208Z
UID:9376-1751302800-1751302800@aspercentre.ca
SUMMARY:Call for Papers: Positive Rights Litigation Symposium
DESCRIPTION:Call for Papers\nRe-Opening the Door: Litigating Positive Rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms\nThe David Asper Centre for Constitutional Rights (the Asper Centre) invites papers for a one-day symposium on litigating positive rights under the Charter. The symposium’s goal is to develop our understanding of positive rights in Canada\, especially the challenges they currently face and the issues that might arise if positive rights were more robustly recognized under the Charter. The symposium\, which will add to the decades-long conversation in Canada among scholars and courts about positive rights\, will take place on Friday January 16\, 2026\, at the Faculty of Law\, University of Toronto. \nTwo decades ago\, in Gosselin\, the Supreme Court of Canada left the door open to an expansive view of positive rights claims under the Charter. Since then\, however\, courts across the country have failed to recognize them. Underpinned by caution and concern\, this pattern holds across diverse contexts\, from the welfare context to the asylum context. Yet\, climate change and growing economic inequality have renewed the push for positive rights. Take Mathur v Ontario\, for example\, the first Charter case concerning climate change to be decided after a full hearing\, or the recent housing cases testing the precedent of Tanudjaja v Attorney General of Canada et al. In both contexts\, litigants have sought relief for urgent and wide-ranging social issues that are difficult to conceptualize or remedy via a purely negative rights framework. These issues\, and the litigation they have spawned\, invite a closer inspection of positive rights under the Charter. \nAgainst this backdrop\, the Asper Centre is seeking submissions from both scholars and practitioners that address the following key questions: \n\nIs there truly a distinction between positive rights and negative rights under the Charter?\nWhat role should Canadian courts play with respect to positive rights\, specifically vis-à-vis Parliament and provincial legislatures? How is this affected by the principles underpinning the separation of powers?\nWhat practical challenges does litigating positive rights pose in areas such as climate change and equality rights?\nWhat is the nature of the social science evidence required to argue or defend these cases?\nWhat does constitutional experience abroad teach us about the potential for positive rights under the Charter?\nWhat are the remedial options for positive rights claims?\nWhat lessons or impacts could be drawn from international law examples?\n\nLocated within the University of Toronto Faculty of Law\, the Asper Centre is devoted to advocacy\, research\, and education on constitutional rights in Canada. Since its inception in 2008\, the Asper Centre has hosted many conferences and symposia focused on various aspects of Charter and public interest litigation. In 2018\, the Asper Centre convened a Public Interest Litigation Conference\, focusing on legal strategies for successful public interest litigation and similarly in 2023 held a symposium focusing on equality rights litigation. The resulting papers were published by LexisNexis Canada in the books Public Interest Litigation in Canada and Litigating Equality\, with corresponding volumes of the Supreme Court Law Review. This symposium seeks to build on the themes explored in earlier events to contribute to the practical scholarship on public interest litigation and to produce a follow-up publication to these earlier works. \nThose interested in participating should send an Abstract (250 words maximum) of your intended paper to Tal Schreier (tal.schreier@utoronto.ca)\, the Asper Centre’s Program Coordinator. Papers may be at any stage of development\, but participants will be expected to circulate a paper of at least 5000 words (final papers should be 5000-10\,000 words). Alternatively\, we welcome shorter case comments of approximately 2500 words that focus on a single court decision. \nDeadline for proposals: June 30\, 2025.
URL:https://aspercentre.ca/event/call-for-papers-positive-rights-litigation-symposium/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Toronto:20250718T120000
DTEND;TZID=America/Toronto:20250718T120000
DTSTAMP:20260405T163400
CREATED:20250704T153143Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250708T140534Z
UID:9514-1752840000-1752840000@aspercentre.ca
SUMMARY:Due date for Asper Centre Clinic (for U of T Law students)
DESCRIPTION:Attention current Upper Year students at U of T Law who are interested in applying to the Asper Centre Fall clinic for-credit course! \nThis year\, the course will be co-taught by our Executive Director\, Cheryl Milne and our 2025 Constitutional Litigator in Residence\, Megan Savard. \nPlease send your one-page statement of interest to Executive Director Cheryl Milne (cheryl.milne@utoronto.ca) by noon on July 18\, 2025.
URL:https://aspercentre.ca/event/application-due-date-for-asper-centre-clinic/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Toronto:20250815T170000
DTEND;TZID=America/Toronto:20250815T170000
DTSTAMP:20260405T163400
CREATED:20250617T174410Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250617T174646Z
UID:9479-1755277200-1755277200@aspercentre.ca
SUMMARY:Application due date for Student Working Group Proposals
DESCRIPTION:Attention Upper Year JD Students at the University of Toronto Faculty of Law:\n\nWe are currently accepting proposals from 2Ls and 3Ls who are interested in leading a student working group at the Asper Centre next year. Please find the CALL for PROPOSALS here.\n\n\nStudent working groups at the Asper Centre provide law students with the unique opportunity to conduct legal research and advocacy on current Canadian Constitutional and Charter rights issues\, often in partnership with an external organization. Examples of past working groups (including this year’s working groups – listed in the image) at the Asper Centre may be found here.\n\nIf you would like to apply to lead a working group but need some assistance in developing your working group proposal\, please contact tal.schreier@utoronto.ca.\nApplications are due at EOD on August 15\, 2025. Successful groups will be notified prior to the start of Fall 2025 term.\n\nWe look forward to working with you.
URL:https://aspercentre.ca/event/application-due-date-for-student-working-group-proposals-2/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://aspercentre.ca/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/2024-2025-SWGs-slide.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Toronto:20250911T123000
DTEND;TZID=America/Toronto:20250911T140000
DTSTAMP:20260405T163400
CREATED:20250826T133432Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250826T133432Z
UID:9643-1757593800-1757599200@aspercentre.ca
SUMMARY:Asper Centre Working Group Information Session
DESCRIPTION:Attention all current University of Toronto Faculty of Law students\, especially 1L’s! \nThe Asper Centre will be convening an Information Session on Thurs Sept 11\, 2025 in P120 at 12h30 to recruit volunteers for its student working groups. \nPlease join us for lunch and learn how to work with us! \nThis year\, we are excited to support the following student working groups: \n\nAccessible Sex Education (with Egale Canada)\nCharter Issues in AI and Predictive Policing (with the Future of Law Lab)\nEncampments and the Charter\nIndigenous Rights\, Environmental Protection\, and the Duty to Consult\n\nCome join us for some 🍕🍕🍕 and learn more!
URL:https://aspercentre.ca/event/asper-centre-working-group-information-session-3/
LOCATION:Jackman Law building P120
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Toronto:20250922T090000
DTEND;TZID=America/Toronto:20250922T090000
DTSTAMP:20260405T163400
CREATED:20250827T141523Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250827T141719Z
UID:9647-1758531600-1758531600@aspercentre.ca
SUMMARY:Application Due Date for Work-Study Position
DESCRIPTION:🚨We’re Hiring!🚨 \nThe Asper Centre is seeking a Work-Study student as a Research & Communications Assistant✍️📢 \nIn this role\, you’ll:\n🔹 Research and draft content for our website & social media (including case summaries and commentary)\n🔹 Attend and report on Asper Centre events (workshops\, conferences\, etc.)\n🔹 Contribute substantive content to our newsletters\n(Website experience is an asset\, but training will be provided!) \n📚 Applicants must be currently enrolled in the JD or LLM programs at the Faculty of Law. \n📝 Apply via CLNx (student job board) by September 22\, 2025 at 9:00 AM. \nCome be part of our work advancing constitutional rights! ⚖️✨
URL:https://aspercentre.ca/event/application-due-date-for-work-study-position/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Toronto:20251021T123000
DTEND;TZID=America/Toronto:20251021T140000
DTSTAMP:20260405T163400
CREATED:20250825T155745Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250825T155922Z
UID:9636-1761049800-1761055200@aspercentre.ca
SUMMARY:Constitutional Roundtable with Andrew Stobo Sniderman
DESCRIPTION:The David Asper Centre for Constitutional Rights’ Constitutional Roundtables are an annual series of lunchtime discussion forums that provide an opportunity to consider developments in Canadian constitutional theory and practice.  The Constitutional Roundtable series promotes scholarship and aims to make a meaningful contribution to intellectual discourse about Canadian constitutional law. \nWe are pleased to be hosting writer and lawyer Andrew Stobo Sniderman for a Constitutional Roundtable on Tuesday October 21\, 2025 at 12h30. \nThe presentation is titled: Constitutional silence\, Section 36 and Unequal Public Services on Indian Reserves \nABSTRACT: Canada’s belated legal reckoning with unequal public services on Indian reserves is only beginning. This article proceeds in two main parts. First\, I address a puzzle: even though the problem of deficient services on reserves endured for decades – and\, in many respects\, endures still – Canadian courts have hardly addressed its constitutionality. This constitutional silence can appear surprising\, even astonishing. Second\, I suggest that the curiously neglected section 36 of the Constitution Act\, 1982\, which calls for ‘reasonably comparable services’ and ‘essential public services of reasonable quality to all Canadians\,’ should inform the constitutional conversation about unequal services on reserves. The exclusion of reserves from equalization\, a principle enshrined in section 36\, is a largely-overlooked legal omission that has enabled the problem to fester. Conceiving of section 36’s components as ‘directive principles’ – neither enforceable fundamental rights nor empty political aspirations – helps unlock new possibilities for judicial and political use\, particularly in light of the treatment of directive principles in other countries. The language of section 36 has never been explicitly used by a Canadian judge as an interpretive aid. This should change. \n \nBIO:  Andrew Stobo Sniderman is an SJD candidate at Harvard Law School and co-author of Valley of the Birdtail: An Indian Reserve\, a White Town\, and the Road to Reconciliation (HarperCollins\, 2022). He has published in the University of Toronto Law Journal\, the Canadian Bar Review\, the Ottawa Law Review\, and the International Journal of Refugee Law. He has also argued before the Supreme Court of Canada\, served as the human rights policy advisor to the Canadian minister of foreign affairs\, and clerked for a judge of South Africa’s Constitutional Court. \nAll are welcome * No RSVP Required * Light lunch provided
URL:https://aspercentre.ca/event/constitutional-roundtable-with-andrew-stobo-sniderman/
LOCATION:Flavelle FL219
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Toronto:20251113T123000
DTEND;TZID=America/Toronto:20251113T140000
DTSTAMP:20260405T163400
CREATED:20251002T014011Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20251028T155245Z
UID:9688-1763037000-1763042400@aspercentre.ca
SUMMARY:Constitutional Roundtable with Professor David M. Rabban
DESCRIPTION:The David Asper Centre for Constitutional Rights’ Constitutional Roundtables are an annual series of lunchtime discussion forums that provide an opportunity to consider developments in Canadian constitutional theory and practice and comparative constitutional law.  The Constitutional Roundtable series promotes scholarship and aims to make a meaningful contribution to intellectual discourse about Canadian constitutional law. \nWe are pleased to be hosting author and Professor David M. Rabban of the University of Texas at Austin School of Law for an in-person Constitutional Roundtable on Thursday November 13\, 2025 at 12h30. A light lunch will be provided. \nThe presentation is titled: The Meaning of Academic Freedom as a First Amendment Right \nABSTRACT: This talk will trace the judicial development of academic freedom as a First Amendment right of professors\, beginning in 1957\, and the judicial extension of the First Amendment right of academic freedom to universities\, beginning in the 1970s.  It will point out that the courts have clearly recognized academic freedom as First Amendment right\, but have disagreed about its coverage.  Nor have courts developed its meaning\, as judges themselves have often complained.  I will assert that academic freedom should be understood as a distinctive First Amendment right that protects the expert academic speech of professors and the educational decisions of universities.  Academic freedom is related to but differentiated from general First Amendment rights of political expression.  I will conclude by applying this understanding of academic freedom to recent intervention by federal and state governments into university affairs. \n \nBIO:  Professor Rabban joined the Texas Law faculty in 1983. He served as counsel to the American Association of University Professors for several years; later\, served as its general counsel and as chair of its committee on academic freedom and tenure. His teaching and research focus on free speech\, academic freedom\, higher education and the law\, and American legal history. He was a fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Foundation in 2016 and of the Program in Law and Public Affairs at Princeton University in 2016-17. His most recent book\, Academic Freedom: From Professional Norm to First Amendment Right\, was published in 2024. \n  \nAll are welcome * No RSVP required * Light Lunch provided
URL:https://aspercentre.ca/event/constitutional-roundtable-with-professor-david-rabban/
LOCATION:Jackman Law Building Room J140\, 78 Queen’s Park
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20260116
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20260117
DTSTAMP:20260405T163400
CREATED:20251118T185303Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260114T180744Z
UID:9779-1768521600-1768607999@aspercentre.ca
SUMMARY:Re-Opening the Door: Litigating Positive Rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
DESCRIPTION:Litigating Positive Rights Symposium\n📅 Friday\, January 16\, 2026 · 9:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. (ET)📍 Henry N. R. Jackman Faculty of Law\, University of Toronto (Room P120) \nOverview\nJoin leading scholars\, practitioners\, and emerging voices for a one-day symposium exploring how positive rights — rights that require governments to act — can be meaningfully advanced under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. From housing and healthcare to climate and digital regulation\, the symposium examines whether Canadian constitutionalism is ready to “re-open the door” first left ajar by the Supreme Court of Canada in Gosselin v. Québec. \nAbout the Symposium\nCo-chaired by Cheryl Milne\, Executive Director of the David Asper Centre for Constitutional Rights\, and Professor David Schneiderman of the University of Toronto Henry N.R. Jackman Faculty of Law\, this event brings together experts from across Canada and abroad to address both the theory and practice of litigating positive rights claims. \nThe Symposium KEYNOTE address will be given by Prof Aoife Nolan\, (School of Law\, University of\nNottingham)\, titled Enforcing Positive Social Rights in an Anti-Democratic Era. \nPanel discussions will explore: \n\nThe conceptual divide between positive and negative rights\nLitigation strategies for social\, environmental\, and economic rights\nEvidence\, remedies\, and practical challenges in Charter claims\nComparative and international perspectives on positive obligations\n\nPlease find the AGENDA for the program here: Asper Centre Symposium Litigating Positive Rights – Agenda and the FULL PROGRAM HERE (with bios and Abstracts). \nWhy This Matters\nClimate justice\, housing insecurity\, healthcare access\, and rapidly evolving digital systems are testing the limits of a Charter framed primarily around negative rights. Rethinking positive obligations is fundamentally about imagining what kind of constitutional community Canada aspires to be — one that simply prevents state intrusion\, or one that supports human dignity through collective responsibility. \nThis symposium will inform the third volume in the Asper Centre’s publication series with Lexis Nexis Canada\, following:📘 Public Interest Litigation in Canada (2018)📘 Litigating Equality in Canada (2023) \nA modest registration fee will apply\, with reduced rates for full-time students.CPD accreditation will be sought for this program. \nMore information and Registration Here
URL:https://aspercentre.ca/event/re-opening-the-door-litigating-positive-rights-under-the-canadian-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms/
LOCATION:P120 Jackman Law Building
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Toronto:20260127T123000
DTEND;TZID=America/Toronto:20260127T140000
DTSTAMP:20260405T163400
CREATED:20251203T155009Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20251215T013455Z
UID:9802-1769517000-1769522400@aspercentre.ca
SUMMARY:Constitutional Roundtable with Professor Richard Moon
DESCRIPTION:The David Asper Centre for Constitutional Rights’ Constitutional Roundtables are an annual series of lunchtime discussion forums that provide an opportunity to consider developments in Canadian constitutional theory and practice.  The Constitutional Roundtable series promotes scholarship and aims to make a meaningful contribution to intellectual discourse about Canadian constitutional law. \nWe are pleased to be hosting Professor Richard Moon for a lunchtime Constitutional Roundtable on January 27\, 2026. \nTitle:  “The Limits of State Neutrality in Religious Matters” \nAbstract: In their early Charter of Rights judgments\, the Canadian courts described religious freedom as a liberty that has two dimensions – the freedom to engage in religious practice without state restriction (unless necessary to advance the public interest) and the freedom from state compulsion to perform a religious practice. However\, in later cases the courts have said that the freedom does not simply prohibit state coercion in matters of religion but requires also that the state remain neutral in religious matters. Religion then must be separated from politics and treated as a private matter that falls within the sphere of personal/communal life rather than the political/civic sphere. \nThe courts\, however\, have not applied the neutrality requirement in a clear or consistent way. Behind the courts’ partial or inconsistent application of the neutrality requirement lies a complex conception of religious commitment in which religion is viewed as both an aspect of the individual’s identity and as a set of judgments or beliefs made by the individual about truth and right. The challenge for the courts is to find a way to fit this complex conception of religious commitment and its value into a constitutional framework that relies on a distinction between individual choices or commitments that should sometimes be protected as a matter of liberty\, and individual attributes or traits that should sometimes be respected as a matter of equality. The constitutional framework (and perhaps more deeply\, our conception of rights) imposes this distinction\, between judgment and identity\, on the rich and complex experience of religious commitment. \nBiography:  Richard Moon is Distinguished University Professor Emeritus at the University of Windsor. His most recent books include The Life and Death of Freedom of Expression (U of T Press\, 2024)\, Freedom of Conscience and Religion\, 2nd ed.  (Irwin Law/ U of T Press\,  2024)\, a co-edited collection\,  Indigenous Spirituality and Religious Freedom (U of T Press\, 2025)\,  and a co-edited Open Access Constitutional Casebook\, CanLii Platform (2025)(involving 43 contributors) https://canlii.ca/t/7jt2q . \nAll are welcome * No RSVP Required * Light lunch provided
URL:https://aspercentre.ca/event/constitutional-roundtable-with-professor-richard-moon/
LOCATION:Flavelle FL219 – John Willis Classroom
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Toronto:20260204T123000
DTEND;TZID=America/Toronto:20260204T140000
DTSTAMP:20260405T163400
CREATED:20251213T192223Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260121T150547Z
UID:9831-1770208200-1770213600@aspercentre.ca
SUMMARY:Constitutional Roundtable with H. Scott Fairley
DESCRIPTION:The David Asper Centre for Constitutional Rights’ Constitutional Roundtables are an annual series of lunchtime discussion forums that provide an opportunity to consider developments in Canadian constitutional theory and practice.  The Constitutional Roundtable series promotes scholarship and aims to make a meaningful contribution to intellectual discourse about Canadian constitutional law.\n\nWe are pleased to be hosting H. Scott Fairley (partner at Cambridge LLP) for a lunchtime Constitutional Roundtable on February 4\, 2026 about his new book\, “Foreign Affairs in the Canadian Constitution” (UBC Press\, 2025). \n\n\n\n\nTITLE: The making of a foreign affairs power within the four corners of the written and unwritten Constitution of Canada (some thoughts Foreign Affairs in the Canadian Constitution and why they matter in these uncertain times). \nABSTRACT: This book challenges previously siloed understandings of treaty-making (federal) and treaty implementation (federal or provincial depending on subject matter regardless of the international context) with a view to bringing them together under a single subject as its title suggests. However\, it does so\, mindful that Canada remains a diverse federal state spread over a vast territory. My account does not seek to drive a cart and a horse through constitutionally allocated provincial powers. What I do say\, however\, is that the “international” makes the “local” of national interest and importance for purposes of federal competence to act comprehensively for that purpose\, both at the executive level and through Parliament as a key part of federal residual powers for the Peace\, Order and Good Government of the Nation or POGG for short. Federal trade and commerce cases have also been very helpful in conveying a similarly principled message. There are chapters on both. In this I am perhaps a little ahead of the Supreme Court of Canada on point\, but that court is not far behind. We might even go so far as to say that our current government is leading with its chin in this area in seeking new allies to augment or replace our now mercurial neighbour to the south and trying to pull off grand projects in the national interest\, in part\, to nurture those relationships. \nBIO: Scott Fairley\, Partner\, Cambridge LLP.\, A.B.\, LL.B. (Queen’s U. at Kingston)\, LL.M. (NYU)\, S.J.D. (Harv.) has a diverse civil litigation and arbitration practice\, a significant portion of which involves public law and international law issues. He was lead counsel in bringing a reference case to the Federal Court of Appeal and then to the Supreme Court of Canada which established the current governing test for the commercial activity exception to sovereign immunity under Canada’s State Immunity Act\, has acted for private and foreign government clients on sovereign immunity cases and  in domestic Crown immunity cases in provincial jurisdictions within Canada\, and has appeared as amicus curiae counsel and as an expert witness in U.S. federal courts the A former academic\, Scott has continued to publish widely in the fields of  public and private international and constitutional law. \n\n\n\n\nAll are welcome * No RSVP Required * Light lunch provided
URL:https://aspercentre.ca/event/constitutional-roundtable-with-scott-fairley/
LOCATION:Flavelle FL219 – John Willis Classroom
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Toronto:20260303T123000
DTEND;TZID=America/Toronto:20260303T140000
DTSTAMP:20260405T163400
CREATED:20251213T194533Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20251213T194533Z
UID:9846-1772541000-1772546400@aspercentre.ca
SUMMARY:Constitutional Roundtable with Justice Colin C.J. Feasby
DESCRIPTION:The David Asper Centre for Constitutional Rights’ Constitutional Roundtables are an annual series of lunchtime discussion forums that provide an opportunity to consider developments in Canadian constitutional theory and practice.  The Constitutional Roundtable series promotes scholarship and aims to make a meaningful contribution to intellectual discourse about Canadian constitutional law. \nWe are pleased to be hosting Justice Colin C.J. Feasby for a lunchtime Constitutional Roundtable on March 3\, 2026. \nAll are welcome * No RSVP Required * Light lunch provided \nTitle: Exploring the Margins of Constitutional Protection for Democracy \nAbstract: Courts play an important role as the referees for democratic competitions.  The democratic rights in the Charter guarantee that courts may fulfill the referee function for federal and provincial elections.  Charter democratic rights do not extend to municipal elections\, school board elections\, band council elections\, and referendums.  The Supreme Court of Canada also resisted the use of Charter s 3 concepts to protect lower order democratic processes under the aegis of freedom of expression in Toronto (City) v Ontario (Attorney General).   Accordingly\, the ability of courts to perform a referee function in relation to lower order democratic processes is limited\, and those processes are vulnerable to predation by higher levels of government.  Justice Feasby’s presentation will question if there are different ways to look at democratic rights\, fundamental freedoms\, and lower order democratic processes that might afford more constitutional protection for such democratic processes. \nBiography: Justice Colin C.J. Feasby graduated from the University of Alberta Faculty of Law in 1998.  He later attended Columbia University where he earned an LL.M and J.S.D.  He practiced at Osler for over 20 years\,  serving the Managing Partner of Osler’s Calgary Office for four years.  As a lawyer\, Justice Feasby had an active trial and appellate practice acting for corporate clients as well as a significant pro bono public interest practice.  He appeared before many courts across the country\, including the Supreme Court of Canada several times.  He has written extensively on constitutional law subjects\, particularly concerning democracy issues.  He was appointed Queen’s Counsel in 2020 and then to the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta in 2021.  In his time as a justice\, he has written many significant decisions including concerning Medical Assistance in Dying\, the constitutionality of changes to regulations governing opioid prescription\, the constitutionality of the Personal Information Protection Act\, and the secession of Alberta from Canada.
URL:https://aspercentre.ca/event/constitutional-roundtable-with-justice-colin-c-j-feasby/
LOCATION:Flavelle FL219 – John Willis Classroom
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Toronto:20260326T163000
DTEND;TZID=America/Toronto:20260326T180000
DTSTAMP:20260405T163400
CREATED:20260317T162935Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260325T115258Z
UID:9966-1774542600-1774548000@aspercentre.ca
SUMMARY:Asper Centre Police Guide launch
DESCRIPTION:The Asper Centre has developed a Police Complaints Guide for Ontario — a practical resource designed to help community members understand and navigate Ontario’s police complaints and oversight systems. To support accessibility across communities\, the guide is available as a downloadable PDF in English\, French\, and Oji-Cree (Anishininiimowin / ᐊᓂᐦᔑᓂᓃᒧᐏᐣ). \nThis project grew out of research identifying significant barriers to accessing police accountability mechanisms — particularly for communities most impacted by systemic racism\, discrimination\, and over-policing\, including Indigenous\, Black\, and 2SLGBTQ+ communities. It responds to calls for accountability\, justice\, and reconciliation\, including those articulated by the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls. \nOn Thursday March 26th\, 2026 we are hosting an event to help promote the guide and give thanks to the many students and stakeholder partners who worked on the guide and/or reviewed its contents. We are grateful to the Law Foundation of Ontario for funding this project. \n👉 LINK to the guide here: www.tinyurl.com/AsperPoliceGuide \nIf you wish to attend the launch event\, please RSVP with your full name and affiliation to tal.schreier@utoronto.ca \n \n 
URL:https://aspercentre.ca/event/asper-centre-police-guide-launch/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Toronto:20260331T123000
DTEND;TZID=America/Toronto:20260331T133000
DTSTAMP:20260405T163400
CREATED:20260206T145023Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260327T150226Z
UID:9928-1774960200-1774963800@aspercentre.ca
SUMMARY:Clinic Information Session (for enrolment in Fall 2026)
DESCRIPTION:Clinic Information Session – for U of T Law upper year students (including rising 2L’s) \nThis information session\, for University of Toronto Faculty of Law upper year students\, will provide details on how to enroll in the for-credit clinical programs at the faculty including the Asper Centre Constitutional Rights Clinic\, Downtown Legal Services\, and the International Human Rights Program for Fall 2026. \nThe following Directors will present at the information session and there will be an opportunity to ask questions: \nPrasanna Balasundaram\, DLS\nCheryl Milne\, Asper Centre\nSandra Wisner\, IHRP
URL:https://aspercentre.ca/event/clinic-information-session-for-enrolment-in-fall-2026/
LOCATION:Jackman Law Room P115
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR