Ontario (Attorney General) v Fraser

2011 SCC 20

SCC Reasons for Judgment

Summary of SCC Decision

Faculty of Law Research and Commentary discussing Ontario (AG) v Fraser

Brian Langille, “The Trilogy is a foreign country, they do things differently there,” (2015) 45:2 Ottawa L Rev. 285.

Brian Langille and Benjamin Oliphant, “The legal structure of freedom of association,” (2014) 40 Queen’s LJ 249.

Brian Langille and Benjamin Oliphant, “From the frying pan into the fire: Fraser and the shift from international law to international “thought” in Charter cases,” (2012) 16 Can Lab & Emp LJ 181-232.

Brian Langille, “Squaring the circle,” (March 2012) 21 National No.2, 22-25.

Brian Langille, “Why the right-freedom distinction matters to labour lawyers – and to all Canadians,” (Spring 2011) 23 Dalhousie LJ 143.

Facta

Date Document
08/18/2009 Appellant Factum – Attorney General of Ontario
10/12/2009 Respondent Factum – Michael J Fraser et al Part I, Part II, Part III
10/27/2009 Appellant Reply Factum – Attorney General of Ontario
11/23/2009 Intervener Factum – Attorney General of Alberta
11/20/2009 Intervener Factum – Attorney General of British Columbia
11/23/2009 Intervener Factum – Attorney General of Canada
11/17/2009 Intervener Factum – Attorney General of New Brunswick
11/20/2009 Intervener Factum – CCLA Part I and CCLA Part II
11/20/2009 Intervener Factum – Justicia for Migrant Workers and Industrial Accident Victims Group of Ontario
11/23/2009 Intervener Factum – Mounted Police Legal Fund
11/20/2009 Intervener Factum – Federally Regulated Employers – Transportation and Communications
09/16/2009 Intervener Factum – Ontario Federation of Agriculture
11/23/2009 Intervener Factum – Canadian Police Association
11/23/2009 Intervener Factum – Canadian Employers Council