Saskatchewan (Human Rights Commission) v. Whatcott

2013 SCC 11

SCC Reasons for Judgment

Webcast of the Hearing

Faculty of Law Research and Commentary discussing Saskatchewan (Human Rights Commission) v. Whatcott

Vincent Chiao, “Equality, Assurance and Criminalization,” (2014) 27 Can JL & Juris 5-25.

Kent Roach and David Schneiderman, “Freedom of Expression in Canada,” (2013) 61 SCLR (2d) 429-525.

Facta

Date	Document
2011/03/29	Appellant – Saskatchewan (Human Rights Commission)
2011/05/06	Respondent – William Whatcott
2011/07/01	Intervener – Attorney General for Saskatchewan
2011/05/30	Intervener – Attorney General of Alberta
2011/07/21	Intervener – Canadian Constitution Foundation
2011/08/05	Intervener – Canadian Civil Liberties Association
2011/08/02	Intervener – Canadian Human Rights Commission
2011/08/04	Intervener – Alberta Human Rights Commission
2011/08/04	Intervener – Ontario Human Rights Commission
2011/06/10	Intervener – Egale Canada Inc.
2011/08/05	Intervener – Canadian Jewish Congress
2011/08/05	Intervener – Unitarian Congregation of Saskatoon and Canadian Unitarian Council
2011/08/04	Intervener – Womens Legal Education and Access Fund
2011/08/02	Intervener – Canadian Journalists for Free Expression
2011/08/01	Intervener – Canadian Bar Association
2011/08/05	Intervener – Northwest Territories Human Rights Commission and Yukon Human Rights Commission
2011/08/04	Intervener – Christian Legal Fellowship
2011/08/05	Intervener – League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada
2011/08/04	Intervener – Evangelical Fellowship of Canada
2011/07/29	Intervener – United Church of Canada
2011/08/02	Intervener – Assembly of First Nations, Federation of Saskatchewan Indian Nations and Metis Nation- Saskatchewan
2011/08/05	Intervener – Catholic Civil Rights League and Faith and Freedom Alliance
2011/08/05	Intervener – African Canadian Legal Clinic